Fayerabend's Critique Of The Method Of Science

FEYERABENDS CRITIQUE OF THE METHOD OF experience PHILOSOPHY OF experience BY MADU SIMON O |(SS/PP/1958) JANUARY 2011 INTRODUCTION In modern times, light is super esteemed. Apparently it is widely held belief that there is something circumscribed to the elevatedest degree science and its regularity which makes it highly acceptable and genuine whenever it is associated with a re search, theory or body of knowledge. There is an abundance of try from everyday aliveness that science is held in high envision in spite of various criticism leveled against it.

The media; finished adverts; oft assert that a particular product, way of life or actions perk up been scientifically proven to be more expedient than others. By doing so, they hope to imply that their need is particularly s closely-founded and perhaps beyond dispute. Many areas of study as well are described as sciences by their supporters; presumptively in an effort to imply that the methods used are as intemperately grounded and potentially fruitful as the traditional sciences, presuppose ph! ysics. In all of these, we have before us a manage appeal to the authority of science and scientists. We might well ask, what is the soil for such authority? Or what is this scientific method that allegedly leads to especially reliable results? Many philosophers have assay to perform these questions which are also attempts to demarcate science from non-science and pseudo-science, by stating what we should have as the method involved in science. However, this subject aims at postulating and assessing the philosophical arguments of Feyerabend with regards to...If you want to get a all-encompassing essay, society it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay